Ues it does mean new...but due to the fact that this kind of thing takes time, Gibbs was asking for the new trial AND an injunction/restraining order against Felos, Greer, and HINO.
So, the judge erred in ruling that because of the lower courts rulings (if you want to call it that) in the past, the success of a new lawsuit would not be won by the Schindlers.
THIS IS CONTRARY TO THE NEW LAW SIGNED ON MONDAY BY PRESIDENT BUSH THAT AMONG OTHER THINGS STATES THAT THE FEDERAL JUDGE IS NOT TO CONSIDER OLD LOWER COURT RULINGS.
THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE A FRESH START.
I think Gibbs was cut off at the pass by GREER WHO WAS PRESENT AT THE FEDERAL COURT. I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF A LOWER COURT JUDGE RUNNING TO THE FEDERAL COURT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I SAID ON CSPAM (I GOT THROUGH) AS WELL AS WHITTEMORE'S ANSWERING MACHING THAT I WANTED TO KNOW H0W MUCH TIME HE SPENT TALKING TO GREER BEFORE HE DECIDED.
WHITTEMORE IGNORED THE NEW LAW.
"WHITTEMORE IGNORED THE NEW LAW"
Lotta 'judges' doing that these days.
But thats okay, because judges are infallible once thay put their black robes on./ sarcasm