[ContemptofCourt]

Which is why you have an appeal process...and the appellate court looked at the evidence and came to the same conclusion as the trial court.

A judge is not super-human, but was the finder of fact in this case. That is the law, and he did his duty.

Again, looking at the opinions, I find no fault with his interpretation of the facts.

[Boardwalk]

In the whole freaking 15 years, did Greer ever once visit Terri? No. Case closed.

[Green]

Again, looking at the opinions, I find no fault with his interpretation of the facts.

I think this is the part that so many people take issue with and that is that no one else has had an opportunity to review what "facts" were not admitted. You can review his rulings and agree with what he entered into the proceedings as "facts" and then say you agree with his interpretation of those facts. But what about what he refused to accept as facts? An appelate court is not going to get into that, are they? I thought they reviewed his opinions to see if he erred as it applied to laws, not his judgement in admitted certain "facts".

[northernlightsII]

And you believe that OJ is actively pursuing the killers,right?