What findings are wrong? A trial was had and evidence heard as set forth by FL law.
Haven't you ever been involved in a trial or rulings issued by a judge that you disagreed with and/or felt that certain issues that to you were "facts" of the case, but dismissed by the judge? Judges are not super-human and above making mistakes.
Nearly EVERY ruling by Greer is disputed. Your faith in the legal system is admirable, but most of us no longer share your enthusiasm due to the sheer idiocy the judiciary has begun to display.
Again, many innocent people have had proper trials, due process followed, and been convicted because the initial findings were flawed. I maintain that this is the case here, where any evidence not supporting the husbands case was disallowed. These findings have only been reviewed for procedure, not for content, hence the de novo portion of the law passed 21 March.