Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Racehorse
My simple understanding (reader's digest version):

With all of the ambition and desire the pre-war Japanese culture had, and being so enamored with the Americans that brought them out of their isolation, many pro-militant Japanese (especially the successful combat hardened Imperial Japanese officers) were discouraged by the lack of racial acceptance of what America use to be.

Japanese militant politics fashioned themselves from misconceived fantasies of the Samurai class defeated by, then, modern conscripted Imperial armies. The fascist politics used a twisted modernized Bushido code to "save face" for failed Japanese politics that couldn't halt encroaching Western powers. The militant politics felt that the expanding Japanese population, and hyper-industrializing society, couldn't and shouldn't be constrained to the Japanese Islands. Because Western powers (particularly British and American are faulted by the militant Japanese) didn't offer a compromise to democratic Japanese politics, the whole of Japan was shamed for having to essential neuter its military, and particularly naval power. Militant politics violently took control of Japanese democratic politics.

(Note of 20/20 hindsight...what if America offered business opportunity to replace what Japan would have built? Build oil tankers and cargo ships instead of battleships and carriers and let's all get rich?)

As previously stated, who should the successful Imperial Japanese military powers kowtow to? The Imperial Navy thoroughly destroyed the Russian Tzar's fleet and any Chinese gunboats tried to tangle with Japan. The Imperial Army had decimated Russian Armies even when the Japanese were clearly outnumbered. Many Japanese had given up the agricultural economy to live in industrialized cities. Western powers blocked resources to Japan that would continue to fuel that economy.

Some historians viewing the Japanese side of history state that their country was staring starvation in the face. Some viewing the nature of Japanese Imperialism didn't like the lack of individual rights that the Empire had for its subjects at home and especially lacking for those conquered. I'm sure that fault can be placed on all sides for what led up to WW2 in the Pacific Theater. I also know that the Christian message was neither well received by former Japanese Shoguns nor other powers that decided Nagasaki (largest population of Japanese Christians) was a legitimate target for destruction. But then again, if all with free will were to have accept the Christian message, then there wouldn't have been all this war history we're talking about right now.
22 posted on 03/21/2005 9:48:19 PM PST by SaltyJoe (Do you "life" enough to earn your inalienable rights? Does your judge think that you're alive?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson