No, the point I was trying to make was that your assertion that the 'custodian' always has the final say without review is absurd. As Rush would say, "illustrating absurdity by being absurd".
No, actually I kind of blew it off as your way of saying "prove it, prove it!!".
LOL! That's an easy way to avoid having to defend an indefensible statement.
The President signed into law, early today, the law passed late yesterday/today.
Here's a quote from the President of the United States...
"Today, I signed into law a bill that will allow federal courts to hear a claim by or on behalf of Terri Schiavo for violation of her rights relating to the withholding or withdrawal of food, fluids, or medical treatment necessary to sustain her life,"
I must be missing something because I don't see, in that statement by the President, the Florida laws that are being circumventing. What exactly is your point by posting it?
You win, I lose.