Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garybob

What's your point?

Congress can CREATE inferior courts, no question, but the clause you sited is merely procedural--it says nothing about the substance of the judicial power. Indeed, look at the first three words: "The judicial power..."

What is the judicial power? For that, we turn to Section two. And we're back to where I was before.

Sorry I skipped that first step for you--to make it clear, I'm not arguing that Congress doesn't have the authority to create a court called the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; I'm saying that court doesn't have jurisdiction to hear the case.


124 posted on 03/21/2005 12:40:18 PM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Valerius

I'm saying that court doesn't have jurisdiction to hear the case.

Now that Congress has passed and the President has signed the law saying that the court has jurisdiction, you are wrong.

130 posted on 03/21/2005 12:45:24 PM PST by garybob (More sweat in training, less blood in combat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: Publius Valerius
I'm not arguing that Congress doesn't have the authority to create a court called the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; I'm saying that court doesn't have jurisdiction to hear the case.

Jurisdiction was granted in the bill signed by the President last night. I want this woman to live and I also want to perserve the Constitution. Congress and President Bush accomplished this.

184 posted on 03/21/2005 3:15:01 PM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson