Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehlert: Congress wrong to be involved in Schiavo case
WSTM.com ^ | 3/21/05 | Bob Joseph

Posted on 03/21/2005 11:31:10 AM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

BINGHAMTON, N.Y. An upstate Republican congressman says federal lawmakers shouldn't have gotten involved in the Terri Schiavo (SHY'-voh) case.

Sherwood Boehlert of Oneida County didn't return to Washington for today's vote on a bill to give the brain-damaged woman's parents the right to ask a federal judge to order doctors to reinsert her feeding tube.

Boehlert told Binghamton radio station W-N-B-F that -- in his words -- "Congress has no business injecting itself" into the case. He said he would not have voted for the bill had he been at the unusual early-morning House session.

Boehlert noted the Schiavo case has been before Florida state courts many times over the past several years.

Boehlert said the decision to have the House vote shortly after midnight was a "crazy way to schedule the whole thing." He said the only way he could have made it back to Washington in time for the vote was to charter a plane -- which he said he wasn't about to do.

(Bob Joseph, WNBF, Binghamton)


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; boehlert; congress; gopmodsquad; rino; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo; terrislaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 last
To: rollo tomasi
Did Terri have any ink on paper regarding her wishes to be starved to death in case she was on a feeding tube?

Nope.

If not, how the heck could anybody kill or more accurate, murder her.

God only knows what goes on in the hearts of these men.

181 posted on 03/21/2005 2:52:10 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Wow! That's quite a statement you made.

Regardless of who comprises the 535 members of Congress, they are more accountable to the people. 435 are elected every two years and 100 every six years. Moreover, the President has veto power to provide some restraint over Congress. It has worked fairly well for almost 220 years.

182 posted on 03/21/2005 2:56:02 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

"Then, according to that belief, 9 justices together are 9 biased justices."

Yes, I guess that is true. Whatever, I'm through with the Republican party. The party of gutless talkers.


183 posted on 03/21/2005 3:08:49 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius
I'm not arguing that Congress doesn't have the authority to create a court called the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; I'm saying that court doesn't have jurisdiction to hear the case.

Jurisdiction was granted in the bill signed by the President last night. I want this woman to live and I also want to perserve the Constitution. Congress and President Bush accomplished this.

184 posted on 03/21/2005 3:15:01 PM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
I believe that she should have been given all the assistance that was due her. The fact that her scumbag husband (?) would not allow that to happen and waited 7 years before he remembered that she would not want to live under these conditions really smells. The fact that he has fought every effort to try to assist her, while enjoying himself with another women, having 2 children, and not even being embrassed about it places him in a very perverted position.

What really bothers me the most is that their are those that turn a blind eye to these visions and are unable to smell the rotten smell that surrounds this entire case.

185 posted on 03/21/2005 4:15:15 PM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

You just don't get it do you? Don't you realize the all powerful Federal government created the states? What the all powerful giveth, the all powerful can take away. I'm beginning to think you don't even know the definitions of republic or federalism.


186 posted on 03/21/2005 4:26:55 PM PST by csmusaret (Urban Sprawl is an oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

//You just don't get it do you? Don't you realize the all powerful Federal government created the states? What the all powerful giveth, the all powerful can take away. I'm beginning to think you don't even know the definitions of republic or federalism.//

Did you forget a [/sarcasm] tag?


187 posted on 03/21/2005 5:29:33 PM PST by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
What in the world is Congress doing if it is not stripping more states' rights away, something most members here at Free Republic normally get very angry about?

Now freepers are applauding the Feds for trampling on states right.

Apparently if YOUR party is using the Constitution as TP, its OK!

188 posted on 03/21/2005 5:33:23 PM PST by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
SCOTUS had to step in re the Bush/Gore decision

No they didn't. They could have simply let stand the Florida State decision.

However, they correctly saw that the state officials were in effect violating the rights of voters by allowing their Democrat buddies to cherry pick which Democrat county votes they would double count, and which "dimpled and pregnant chads" they would choose to count.

In this case, the US legislature (remember your civics class, the three co-equal branches of government) saw what they perceived to be a Fla state court/judge which violated the rights of a woman who is about to be put to death by accepting a hearsay claim by a husband who has a vested interest in seeing her dead.

You know, it's funny. I flipped past Larry King Live tonight and there was Larry King asking Michael Shiavo if he, when she got sick back in 1992, had promised her he would pull the plug.

"Yes I did, Larry." Michael said. "We both promised each other ...."""

Now ask yourself, how in the freaking world did she speak to him back then when she had gone immediately into potassium deprived unconsciousness and has never since regained her voice.

189 posted on 03/21/2005 6:58:07 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: supercat

I sure did dude.


190 posted on 03/21/2005 7:21:20 PM PST by csmusaret (Urban Sprawl is an oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

I'm suprised it took so long for someone to call me on it.


191 posted on 03/21/2005 7:22:55 PM PST by csmusaret (Urban Sprawl is an oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: kate in carolina
The hospital simply made the decision, and the Texas courts upheld that decision after the mother failed, during the 10-day window provided for by Texas law, to find another institution willing to take the child. Where was Congress last week?

That family had every right to find a new health care provider for their child and/or pay for treatment themselves. I have no doubt that Terri's parents would be elated to have that option.

192 posted on 03/22/2005 7:11:57 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13

Last night O'Reilly claimed that this hospice cost 83 grand a day. Now I don't believe that but do believe that it costs as much as 83 grand a month. It is not cheap. Hospice also sends workers around to the homes of the terminally ill whose familys chose to have them there as was the case with my wife. No research is necessary for me to know that or to know that NO facility dealing with people is cheap. NOT ONE. Thus I do not believe ANY lawyer is foregoing such revenues.

There is no money left. You accuse me on not knowing the facts but there is at least ONE that I know: staying in ANY hospital for seven yrs will cost at least a million.

I don't CARE that MS has moved on with his life given the fact that he considers his former wife dead no matter how much her family wants to torture him with what is left. It is completely irrelevent to any of the substantive issues here.


193 posted on 03/22/2005 12:45:28 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
I don't CARE that MS has moved on with his life given the fact that he considers his former wife dead no matter how much her family wants to torture him with what is left. It is completely irrelevent to any of the substantive issues here.

What do you mean it's completely irrelevant? It's absolutely relevant. You're talking about the person who is making life and death decisions about another human being. You don't think it's essential that someone who holds that responsibility be completely free of conflict of interest?

If Michael thinks she's dead already then why doesn't he just move on and leave her the hell alone?

We shall just leave your ridiculous comments for all to see.

As far as the money - it is a FACT that Michael has spent down the malpractice award on his lawyers, not on Terri's care. Regardless of how much you think it costs to stay in a hospice (althought I did explain to you that Felos is on the board of directors at that hospice and if not getting the space for free is certainly getting a cut rate), the money did not come from TERRI'S award.

One more thing - if you are going to rely on Bill O'Reilly for your "facts"....need I say more....

Summary of expenses paid from Terri’s 1.2 Million Dollar medical trust fund (jury awarded 1992)

NOTE:  In his November 1993 Petition Schiavo alleges the 1993 guardianship asset balance as $761,507.50

Atty Gwyneth Stanley
Atty Deborah Bushnell
Atty Steve Nilson
Atty Pacarek
Atty Richard Pearse (GAL)
Atty George Felos

$10,668.05
$65,607.00
$7,404.95
$1,500.00
$4,511.95
$397,249.99

Other

1st Union/South Trust Bank

$55,459.85

Michael Schiavo

$10,929.95

Total  $545,852.34


194 posted on 03/22/2005 5:47:10 PM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson