That is only true with the qualification "court-appointed". The court has consistently taken a pro-death position, even removing a guardian ad litem who complained that MS was acting unreasonably (and appointed Greer as both judge and guardian!). Weldon, the Republican congressman who is a physician has stated that a neurologist has told him that he doubts that Teri is in a PVS.
Then I stand corrected.
You see, I'm simply not afraid to change my position provided the facts warrant.
However, I have seen some blatant and outright deceptions and lying on the part of those who support Terri's parents. Sifting through what is right and hauling on the carpet those who've been lying is incredibly hard. They simply don't seem to care that they will be exposed - for them, the end justifies the means.
As a conservative, it is difficult for me to side with the MSM and the Democrats, but in this instance; it appears they are actually right for a change.
Claiming all 11 courts are on a pro-death position really stretches the imagination. Why this case and not the others? Why the apparent legal conspiracy to *kill* this one woman and not any others? Where is the bloodbath from other cases?
See what I mean? It is absurd to think all 11 courts were out to *get* Terri by siding with her husband.