Rational people understand that
having a new common-law wife and family
automatically destroys
any "spousal rights" claim
that he may have had
to be the guardian
of the woman who
practically and logically speaking
is now his former wife.
At the very least he has a conflict of interest that he cannot overcome when it comes to any decision about Terri's fate.
"Judge" Greer seems to be an incompetent buffoon.
And you seem to be ill-informed about her current state of health and the therapy her "husband" has denied her.
Logical people understand that's irrelevant. Michael is her guardian.
"At the very least he has a conflict of interest that he cannot overcome when it comes to any decision about Terri's fate."
What's the conflict? Live or die, there's no conflict. What are you talking about?
"And you seem to be ill-informed ..."
And you seem to be ignorant of what I know.