[robertpaulsen]

You do realize that it was the judge that ordered the feeding tube removed after hearing testimony? This was not Michaels decision. He brought it to the judge to decide.

So, your scenario about the parents choosing to withhold food is wrong and is also inflammatory to the discussion.

[zook]

In your post, #141, you attempt to somehow respond to analogies and arguments I made earlier. Unfortunately, your response makes no sense at all. First of all, Michael went to court to obtain permission to remove the feeding tube, not to ask the judge decide what to do.

Second, deal with my analogies about the slippery slope, or, ignore them if you like. But don't tell me they're inflammatory. That makes you sound like some sort of weirdo.