| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 03/22/2005 6:58:02 PM PST by Lead Moderator, reason:
Part 4, day 5 thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1368430/posts |
Posted on 03/20/2005 10:27:03 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida
Theodore R. wrote:
I wrote a post hours ago suggesting that Greer and the clintoid judge may have been in telephone contact all morning. Perhaps Greer's presence was intended to remind the judge of "their agreement" on the phone.""""
I've thought the same thing. I'm terrified this is the case. Felos and HINO both look way too happy today.
We need a miracle from GOD ALMIGHTY~~!!!!!
We should always look to God first, cause man will always fail us.
I wonder what his family will think of him if he allows Terri to die without a decision being made or he was too afraid to go against Greer.
I don't know about trying to contact judges.
We have to see what Judge Whittemore does.
TIME TO CONTACT THE PRESIDENT!!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1367477/posts?page=28
New tagline. My other one was "Would you have starved Ronald Reagan?"
Good observation. If I was married to a Federal Judge on this case, he would be sleeping on the couch until me made a decision, and barred from the home permanently if she died.
I would be surprised if this judge and Greer were on the phone at all this morning. If this judge is going to throw it for Greer -- and I'm not denying they may be in cahoots -- he won't need to run anything by Greer; he'll just throw it. In fact, if Greer was in the courtroom, it makes it more unlikely he had spoken to the judge, because why highlight their connection to the public by appearing in this judge's courtroom? My guess is that Greer went to the courtroom as a way to influence this judge, who perhaps for reasons having to do with not wanting to leave tracks, has not been taking Greer's calls. Was Greer's visit to the courtroom effective? Maybe. In any case, again, I doubt they were on the phone today.
LOL! :oD
That's because he decided to mess with this case as an emergency injuction type of case. Rather than realize that Terri has the emergency of death hanging over her, and it's his responsibility to preserve her while he dithers, he looked at it like this: if Gibbs cannot show me enough to make me thing he could very well win in a de novo trial, and I have not seen it based on the old trial record and the new filings, then I am inclined to not grant his emergency relief for Terri. If the judge were following the de novo aspect of the law, he would rehydrate Terri and begin a new trial. If not, he would pass on it somehow and give Gibbs an appealable issue to the Atlanta court. He is doing none of these things, while Terri moves closer and closer to irreversible damage. That is what it looks like to me, and I say that knowing that all of us, myself included, are fallible and do make erroneous judgements.
I agree. We're all in this together.
I remember that. For tube reinsertion, and also when Hospice was being renovated and repainted.
As you said, we'd have to see the context of the question.
Just got off work. How's Terri holding up? Let's get this to Atlanta. I could be wrong but by this judge dragging his heels I don't expect him to help Terri. IMO by not at least ordering an IV started while he decides shows where he camps.
Despair? Jesus asked why hath Thou forsaken me and got an answer.
It's still Game Day, it's still Good v. Evil.
CMO winner Benevidez said my hands were moving so fast making the sign of the cross I looked like a propeller--all while shooting at the enemy and rescuing wounded friendlies.
When it was over and Reagan had given him the medal he said "hero? No, just doing my duty."
From the top.
Left up to the anti-Terri crowd, they probably would.
I called it and left a message....I said "I just have one thing to say...."what would Jesus DO?" and hung up. Now they will probably trace my phone number and put me under FBI surveillance!!! LOL
They were unbelievable. Poor, poor Terri for having married into that family. They were loud, vicious and creepy and threatened talk show host Glenn Beck. They both callously said about Terri,"There's NOTHIN' there."
I was the second caller after their interview was finished (I was holding through out the interview hoping we would be able to question them). I did not get a chance to make the few targeted points I wanted to make. I was only able to discuss the conflicting hearsay testimony and that Greer discounted the testimony of Terri's friend.
Scoop, you would be interested to know, Steve Schiavo said the Schindlers said on the stand they didn't know what Terri wanted. They were responding to Randall Terry's comment on Hannity that Michael said "we didn't know what she wanted." They said Randall lied and that the remarks were made in court by the Schindlers.
It's all over for you now. The phone police are gonna' getcha!...:-)
It *would* be better for Hospice if the House Committee had Terri "testify" elsewhere.
James Whittemore's office 1-813-301-5880 Machine.
They ask for name, # and a message. I called twice today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.