It seems we agree in general, but differ in the details.
Greer cannot rule on a case, unless it is Filed by a plaintiff, which is Michael.
Michael filed a pleading to have the food/water cut off, then Greer saw the case in court, then he ruled.
Here is where you need to concern yourself.....
Judge Greer is Guardian of Terri's rehab/care money. He authorized Michael to take some of the money and get a lawyer and file the pleading to have Terri Killed.
First, the judge violated principles of guardianship in giving out the money to have the principle of the estate put to death.
Second, If he thought it was OK to allow Michael to ask to have Terri killed, then how could he be JUDGE over the case as well?
That made him undeniably biased and he should have recused himself from ruling on the case, and let another judge have it.
The fact he didn't demonstrates how CORRUPT he is.
The fact he didn't demonstrates how CORRUPT he is.
How much did HE get of Terri's money???