I'm with you on the unsubstantiated charges. The death threats dismay me to no end, too. Nothing like being "right to life" then threatening someone with death.
I would argue this case is important, because there are broad national implications, too. There are two ends to the spectrum of death, abortion and right to die. Once those lines are drawn, it is only a matter of time before moves are made to redraw them.
For instance, who in their right mind would have ever expected the right to abortion to eventually include the atrocity known as "partial birth abortion?"
If you're so worried about unsubstantiated allegations, why were you jumping all over Howlin?
This bill could have some serious consequences. Why are people implying that Howlin or others who aren't toeing the lineon this "pro-death" or something?
Then you recognize the problem some of us have. It is perfectly legitemite to discuss whether or not Ms. Schiavo's wishes were adequetly established, or whether or not they are being carried out. It's even well and good to discuss whether or not it's RIGHT.
However, when those on one side try to "enhance" their case through conspiracy theories, slander, and accusations without foundation, and hurl invective at anyone who points out the fallacies and flaws, sooner or later their whole case comes into question.
And when they seemingly abandon all previous positions regarding government interference in personal, local, and state matters and call for the feds to intervene, it damages their credibility and position in those things as well.
The death threats are "beyond the pale", and give most folks the willies when examining ANYTHING that side puts out. It's hard to persuade someone when you've made it clear to them that you're a maniac.
In this case, many longtime FReepers, having had their fill of the invective and wild vitriol, decided to investigate the claims for themselves, and came to different conclusions than the "Terri Brigades". They posted that information. In due time, it will also be seen by lawmakers, some of whom will doubtless come to the same conclusions. They won't be happy, either.
What's that mean for the next case? Or other controversial issues? Politicians don't like being made fools of.