I believe in looking at both sides; and I don't think they're found on FR in any way, shape, or form.
As soon as any article that doesn't condmen him to hell is posted, people start trashing him and there is effectivly NO DISCUSSION.
If you dare to ask a question, you're called a murderer, or told to go back to DU (Yes, a million people have called me a troll and told me to get over to DU).
And if you are interested in the legal proceedings and ask questions about it, someone will come along and jump you and call you a euthansia lover.
I remember when conservatives use to be for the rule of law; I remember when conservatives use to be for the sanctity of marriage; I remember when conservatives use to be opposed to activist judges.
And I remember when people on FR could voice their opinions without being repeatedly drummed off threads; my Freepmail box is FULL of pages and pages of emails from people who are AFRAID to post on these threads to voice their opinions because of the vicousness of the attacks, just like I was on this very thread.
I am of the opinion that this is a BAD bill, if it gets past the USSC; it opens the door to anybody that you know butting into your life.
And I remember when conservatives thought the government should get out of our lives.
Howlin,
I don't think any of those things about you, never have and never will. You are right you have a right to your opinion and you shouldn't take others thought to heart. The people on FR are just very passionate and maybe a little over zealous, but they mean well. We are starting to act like the librals and "eat our own". LOL
I don't ever want you to leave FR because you are very intelligent with many of you views.
I too am very passionate about these circumstances. But I've been following Terri over the years. She just seems like she should be given the chance thats all.
I believe in looking at both sides, but there is no evidence Michael is telling the truth. People have been asked for it and they can't provide it.
Can you bother to explain how a private bill for the relief of one individual sets precedent when it is specifically designed not to do so?
As soon as any article that doesn't condmen him to hell is posted, people start trashing him and there is effectivly NO DISCUSSION.
If you dare to ask a question, you're called a murderer, or told to go back to DU (Yes, a million people have called me a troll and told me to get over to DU).
And if you are interested in the legal proceedings and ask questions about it, someone will come along and jump you and call you a euthansia lover.
I remember when conservatives use to be for the rule of law; I remember when conservatives use to be for the sanctity of marriage; I remember when conservatives use to be opposed to activist judges.
And I remember when people on FR could voice their opinions without being repeatedly drummed off threads; my Freepmail box is FULL of pages and pages of emails from people who are AFRAID to post on these threads to voice their opinions because of the vicousness of the attacks, just like I was on this very thread.
I am of the opinion that this is a BAD bill, if it gets past the USSC; it opens the door to anybody that you know butting into your life.
And I remember when conservatives thought the government should get out of our lives.
Howlin, I just wanted again say I appreciate your point of view. You carefully crafted and worded an accurate observation.
It is always my hope that we all can treat each other respect and dignity even when we disagree. The lines are drawn and I wonder if folks will use this issue to define who they will and will not debate with on future news items?