Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Two-Bits

"Well I guess in the next election, we will not have to worry about obstruction from the Democrats. It is clear that we will probably have over 60 senators. The Republican Motto is If you want to live - Vote Republican. Democrat Party continues down their spiral of unimportance. I can't believe they are that stupid.....Do they realize that Senior Citizens are watching this and thinking, my god, would our children one day want to put us down...."

Very good point!
I worked the polls in this last election.
The elderly were out in the heat standing in lines for a long time. Many buses brought them all from the nursing homes. I had no idea how many elderly people were in my area until that day.

Wanna know what they told me?
I'll sum it up with a couple quotes:
"I won't die with a man like John kerry in office"
"I won't die knowing the heartless dems have taken over my country"


1,603 posted on 03/20/2005 9:08:16 PM PST by GottaLuvAkitas1 (Ronald Reagan is the TRUE "Father Of Our Country".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1493 | View Replies ]


To: All
I noted that Pope John Paull II was quoted by a Republican during the debate and thought I would offer additional information for any that might be interested. The Catholic Church teaches that all living humans inherently created in God's image possess dignity that is recognized and respected immutably. Thus, to suggest one could provide the dying 'dignity' by facilitating their death to circumvent suffering or hardship would be but errant morally relative argument. Additionally, the Church teaches that artificial nutrition and hydration is not extraordinary care and as such removal of artificial nutrition and hydration would be tantamount to "procuring death" (murder) rather than "permitting death":

Here are some linked documents that can answer any questions:

Declaration on Euthanasia

Respect for the dignity of the dying

The approach to the gravely ill and the dying must therefore be inspired by the respect for the life and the dignity of the person. It should pursue the aim of making proportionate treatment available but without engaging in any form of "overzealous treatment" (cf. CCC, n. 2278). One should accept the patient's wishes when it is a matter of extraordinary or risky therapy which he is not morally obliged to accept. One must always provide ordinary care (including artificial nutrition and hydration), palliative treatment, especially the proper therapy for pain, in a dialogue with the patient which keeps him informed.

At the approach of death, which appears inevitable, "it is permitted in conscience to take the decision to refuse forms of treatment that would only secure a precarious and burdensome prolongation of life" (cf. Declaration on Euthanasia, part IV) because there is a major ethical difference between "procuring death" and "permitting death": the former attitude rejects and denies life, while the latter accepts its natural conclusion.

International Congress: Life-Sustaining Treatments and Vegetative State: Scientific Advances and Ethical Dilemmas

2,038 posted on 03/20/2005 9:35:50 PM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1603 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson