The parents want her, there is ambiguity about her wishes, and death by dehydration is certainly unpleasant.
And it wouldn't hurt to have another court review this matter and, considering the controversy, take it out of Michael's hands. If he's telling the truth, he's done his best for his wife and there would be no shame (or damage caused) by his failure to fulfill her wish.
Further, it would a lesson to all that those who fear they might find themselves in such a state to have it well recorded they would not object to death by dehydration.
Points all well taken,
I worry that giving her to her parents, who is going to take care of her when her parents again find taking care of her too overwhelming like the did in the past?
ANother court looking at it is ok if there was some LEGAL error found in the previous rulings.
Just because one doesn't like or agree with the outcome of a legal case, doesn't give justification to move it to another court for review.
Imagine how long cases would be litigated if that is the route we are to take from now on.