I thought that a doctor, an impartial doctor, was assigned to Terri to determine what is best for her.
My husband has executive power (I'm not sure that's the term and he's golfing right now) over his aunt who is mentally ill, 93, blind and confined to bed for 15 years.
The doctors wanted to insert a stomach tube years ago and we did not want that. But we also stood to benefit financially when she died and didn't want any complications from a decision we made, so we had the court assign a doctor to her case to make the decision.
I don't think Judge Greer is who I was thinking of.
I am sorry, but once again, you are incorrect.
The doctors wanted to insert a stomach tube years ago and we did not want that. But we also stood to benefit financially when she died and didn't want any complications from a decision we made, so we had the court assign a doctor to her case to make the decision.
I think that you made the 'best' decision, in that case. Considering the position you were in, you guys took yourself out of the loop, and gave the decision to an unbiased person with expertise in that portion of the medical field. That was the best moral, and legal thing to do.
Maybe Michael tried to do the same thing. I still believe that FELOS was looking for a case like TERRI's to use to support his beliefs, so use to help him in his EUTHANASIA CAMPAIGN, and to profit illegally from MEDICARE SCAMS (which he and the HOSPICE of which he was on the BOARD OF DIRECTORS) has been accused of by the DEPT of HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES to the tune of over $14 million.
I think FELOS is using him, and having the doctors tell MICHAEL and the JUDGE that TERRI is a vegetable.