If that is true then wouldn't it seem obvious that her parents would have long ago brought charges. Or if not her parents then the state. After all you don't need a family member to bring charges against someone who murders someone the state will do that automatically. Or can we assume that once she it dead then thius will atuomatically happens seeing as how we are talking about something that has not occured yet.
Although at this point we can safely say that attempted murder has happened 3 times which should be sufficient to have someone arrested and tried and easily convicted.
I would say that in fact the judge has not broken the law because he is still a judge and has not been arrested tried and convicted.
What kind of cloud-cuckoo-land do you come from? Because the burglar has not been arrested, he is not a burglar? Maybe with respect to applying criminal penalties, but in common sense this is looniness.
Not necessarily. In any case, this is from Jay Wolfson..
A REPORT TO GOVERNOR JEB BUSH AND THE 6TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN THE MATTER OF THERESA MARIE SCHIAVO
Mr. Pearse documents the evolving disaffections between the Schindlers and Michael Schiavo. He concludes that Michael Schiavo's testimony regarding the basis for his decision to withdraw life support – a conversation he had with his wife, Theresa, was not clear and convincing, and that potential conflicts of interest regarding the disposition of residual funds in Theresa's trust account following her death affected Michael and the Schindlers – but he placed greater emphasis on the impact it might have had on Michael's decision to discontinue artificial life support. At the time of Mr. Pearse's report, more than $700,000 remained in the guardianship estate.
Plus hearsay evidence is by default inadmissible.