Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
ok, thanks.

I still don't understand the consistency part you were stressing so much at the beginning of this thread. I was trying to figure out if it was 'application of the law' or 'support of life/liberty', but I think it was simply 'not having federal agents intervene'.
I completely agree that we need to have principles. And stick to them. I suspect we would disagree as to which principle here is the most important. But I know better than to argue this one. Sometimes...
432 posted on 03/18/2005 8:05:00 PM PST by LearnsFromMistakes (We know the right things to do, why don't we just do them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]


To: LearnsFromMistakes; Howlin
That bears repeating, as honorable people can come to different conclusions based upon the principles which guide them. If the current laws somehow allow a spouse to make hearsay cases for death then I have a really big problem with that, as I think the unalienable right to life trumps any rights of any others.
449 posted on 03/18/2005 8:25:29 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson