"Please respond to my question.
Should all those who cannot feed themselves, ARE NOT IN A PVS or on artificial life support, be "allowed to die?"
But your question does not apply here. ( writing things in capitals does not mae it so )
Yes it does apply. She is not a 'vegetable.' She should not be murdered because she can't eat.
It does too apply. When all of us were born, we couldn't feed ourselves but that wouldn't mean that starving us to death wasn't murder. If my parents had refused to feed my brother when he was born because he couldn't feed himself, they would've been arrested for murder. Why is it that liberals would scream bloody murder at a dog being starved to death but when a judge and a "husband" are trying to starve a woman to death, she has a "right to die"?