To: Noah_Si al_178?
The opposing argument is that it would be inhumane to keep her alive. So it's a wash. The 'opposing argument' is to starve her to death. That's a wash?
In your view, everyone who cannot feed him/her self should be allowed to die?
Does that quadriplegics? Alzheimer's patients? Babies?
514 posted on
03/18/2005 7:25:51 AM PST by
ohioWfan
(The trumpet of freedom has been sounded, and that trumpet never calls retreat. (George W. Bush))
To: ohioWfan
Exactly.
There are thousands of folks in this country who cannot feed themselves....hospitals, nursing homes and residence facilities for the seriously disabled, are full of them.
If Terri is legally starved to death, they're next.
544 posted on
03/18/2005 7:42:30 AM PST by
BizzeeMom
("We cannot do great things. We can only do small things with great love" Bl. Teresa of Calcutta)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson