Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hank Rearden

I may be mistaken, someone, anyone, please correct me if I am, but I believe that Greer has had this case since day one and he's been the one blocking evidence from being admitted. Then when a higher court reviewed it, there was no contradictory evidence.

Greer, if not operating from an agenda, is too emotionally involved in this case and his egomaniacal personality will not allow anything or anyone to get in between him and his decision that this woman must die.

He is not supposed to care. He is to be an impartial trier or fact and law and he is not unbiased. He should be removed from the case and impeached because he is not fit to serve.


348 posted on 03/18/2005 12:54:05 AM PST by Badray (Quinn's First Law -- Liberalism ALWAYS generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]


To: Badray
I may be mistaken, someone, anyone, please correct me if I am, but I believe that Greer has had this case since day one and he's been the one blocking evidence from being admitted.

OK. Knowing that, I can't understand why he was re-elected overwhelmingly last November. In the process of saving Terri, there was a movement to quash the will of the people by impeaching Greer, who was re-elected by the people of Florida.

352 posted on 03/18/2005 12:59:34 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (You have a //cuckoo// God given right //Yeeeahrgh!!// to be an //Hello?// atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson