Replies

http://www.theempirejournal.com/03200561_unlawfulness.htm

Unlawfulness, Not Emotion Key Issue in Schiavo Case

It’s important for America to understand that Congress must get involved in the Terri Schindler-Schiavo situation. Yes, this is an emotional case, and yes there are questions about the right to die, but at the heart of the issue are the mass violations of laws that have been broken to bring the case this far--as far as Washington.

1. The judge is not in office legally. He violated Florida Statutes by not qualifying for office and thus could not legally appear on the ballot and was not legally elected. Therefore, he has no legal jurisdiction in the Schiavo case or any other judicial matter.

2. The judge based his death ruling on inadmissible hearsay which is barred by Florida Statutes.

Michael Schiavo ONLY “remembered” what Terri supposedly said AFTER the malpractice money was given to him. money that was to be for her care and therapy which he then refused her. Instead, Judge Greer allowed Terri’s rehabilitation money to be used for Michael’ to pay lawyers to kill her by removing her feeding tube.

3. Judge Greer is acting in the statutorily prohibited and ethically prohibited dual role of judge and guardian

4. Judge Greer never seen his ward which is yet another violation of the Florida Statutes.

5. Judge Greer has denied Terri independent legal counsel, a violation of Florida Statutes and denial of the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

6. Judge Greer has allowed Michael to unlawfully place Terri in a Hospice and engage in a Medicare and Medicaid fraud. She is not terminal and the "certification" presented was not done lawfully.

People must separate the emotion from the laws that were broken. Even if one is an advocate of the right to die, it must done within the confines of law –such was not the case here.