“I am, rather, asking you to examine the very assumptions you have about the Constitution and the manner in which it handles the powers given to the Congress versus those reserved to the people.
You want to argue minute points without understanding the very basics.”
How can I take such a comment seriously when you are bouncing all over the constitution and you constantly confuse your opinion with constitutional law?
If you want to leave the second amendment and speak of general property law, then say so. If, as you note above, you wan to discuss the 9th and 10th amendments, then we can go there. What we cannot do is discuss a second amendment issue using other parts of the constitution as probative.
SD