you have asked for "a case" and I have given you THE TEXTBOOK.
It is now your task to provide a compelling argument in accord with that textbook which clearly allows the federal government to deny to the private citizen the right to keep and bear heavy weaponry.
addendum:
considering the 9th and 10th Amendments, and the "Establishment" clause, I really truly doubt you shall be able to do so.
"you have asked for "a case" and I have given you THE TEXTBOOK.
It is now your task to provide a compelling argument in accord with that textbook which clearly allows the federal government to deny to the private citizen the right to keep and bear heavy weaponry."
No you have incorrectly referenced a document and then made logic leaps not backed by the documents you wish to use as authority.
Again, I have no responsibility to prove private citizens cannot own artillery. They can, the ownership is restricted. There is a vast amount of federal regulation and case law that supports my view and zero as in none that supports yours.
If you doubt me, try buying a missile launcher on E-Bay. The feds will be amused with your defense.