I suspect that you are not drawing a distinction between really "... refus[ing] to view/see evidence on the side of the (parents)" and declining to give it the weight to which you feel it was entitled. Two different things.
You are entitled to your opinion of the relative weight of the evidence, but with all respect no one appointed or elected you a judge.
NO, sir, he REFUSED. From what I have read, documentations was submitted to him, and he would deny it without looking at it. He also has not seen any of the videos of Terri. AND, you would think, since there is such a descrepancy about Terri's condition, he would go see for himself. I would think any normal person would do that. After all, Terri herself is as much, if not more so, evidence as any documentation, videos, etc. So, dear sir, he is NOT seeing the evidence; he is refusing to see it!