Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bolton: Truth teller at U.N. [Tear Them A New One John!]
The Hill ^ | March 15, 2005 | David Keene

Posted on 03/15/2005 8:52:50 AM PST by conservativecorner

We are told that United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan gasped when informed by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that President Bush intends to send John Bolton to New York to represent this nation’s interests before the world body.

Annan had been hoping, no doubt, for someone more malleable who would politely look the other way or at least keep his mouth shut as the various scandals rocking the United Nations play out, someone more like departing Ambassador John Danforth. Danforth may have represented the Bush administration, but he was a team player who did little to upset things and he was unfailingly polite.

Indeed, in the face of the oil-for-food scandal and revelations that U.N. forces were raping civilians in the Congo, Danforth actually called a news conference to support and praise Annan for his service to the United Nations and to humanity. It didn’t seem to bother Danforth that Annan’s son and highest appointees apparently have accepted kickbacks from deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein or that Annan himself facilitated a genocidal uprising in Rwanda.

Danforth’s commitment to the world body was never in question. The former Missouri senator seemed to share Annan’s stated view that support for the U.N. concept is so important that the truly committed are obligated to ignore the United Nations’ real-world shortcomings.

It is difficult to imagine Bolton holding such a news conference. Before being named ambassador, Danforth’s experience with Annan and his pals was largely theoretical; he was a believer in international cooperation, a nice fellow who no doubt viewed the world body with hope untempered by reality.

His successor brings a different temperament and a far different view of the United Nations’ strengths and weaknesses. Bolton has spent a lifetime working with and observing the goings-on in New York. As assistant secretary of state for international organizations under James Baker, Bolton fought to keep international thugs of one stripe or another from using the world body to advance not world peace but their own ideological and racist agendas.

Bolton is as unabashedly willing to stand up for this nation’s interests as were Jeanne Kirkpatrick and Daniel Patrick Moynihan when they served previous presidents at the United Nations. He combines that laudatory trait with an understanding of what can and cannot be expected of the United Nations in today’s world. Those factors alone uniquely qualify him for the job Bush has given him.

Bolton’s critics suggest that his recognition of the weaknesses of the world body and his persistent calls for reform over the years disqualify him for the job. They seem to share the secretary-general’s view that a true friend of the United Nations would keep his mouth shut no matter what. Some in the Senate are even suggesting that they might oppose Bolton’s confirmation because he has been too willing to stand up for U.S. interests and to speak the truth about the United Nations.

What they don’t seem to realize is that the United Nations has become its own worst enemy and that unless it is reformed and reformed fast it will not survive. The president and Secretary Rice say that Bolton will go to New York to lead an effort to reform the place before it is too late. Bolton is one of the very few people who might be able to handle or even understand the assignment.

I’ve known Bolton for nearly 30 years — I was working for Vice President Agnew at the time and hired him for Agnew’s staff. He’s as tough as his critics fear and as realistic as he seems. He sees the world as it is rather than as he might wish it to be and deals unflinchingly with that reality. He’s succeeded in every job he’s ever held and has done so without sacrificing either his principles or the interests of those he has served. He is, above all, a truth teller — just what we need right now in New York.

It is unfortunate but true that, in today’s world, men and women with such qualities are feared more often than they are celebrated. We live in an era in which speaking the truth is seen not as strength but a sign of naiveté. The folks who have made such a mess of the United Nations survive because they know just how to manipulate people and nations anxious to avoid unpleasantness, even if it means ignoring the reality around them.

They don’t know how to deal with someone like Bolton. That’s why Annan gasped when informed of his appointment, and it’s exactly why Bolton’s the right man for the job.

Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union, is a managing associate with Carmen Group, a D.C.-based governmental-affairs firm (www.carmengrouplobbying.com).


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bolton; un

1 posted on 03/15/2005 8:52:54 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: conservativecorner
We are told that United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan gasped when informed by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that President Bush intends to send John Bolton to New York to represent this nation’s interests before the world body.

WooHoo! Kerry cannot understand the appointment, North Korea considers him human scum and Kofi gasps! We need a count down to Bolton's first day in the U.N. Body.

3 posted on 03/15/2005 9:01:12 AM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
[Danforth] no doubt viewed the world body with hope untempered by reality.

Iow, a liberal.

4 posted on 03/15/2005 9:02:11 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Oh, man. I wish he would bring the place crashing down. If Bush could destroy the United Nations that would do more to advance the security and sovereignty of the United States that any other single act.


5 posted on 03/15/2005 9:04:12 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Some in the Senate are even suggesting that they might oppose Bolton’s confirmation because he has been too willing to stand up for U.S. interests

These Senators wear their treason as a badge of honor.

6 posted on 03/15/2005 9:05:46 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

Ambassador to the UN should only be Bolton's first step.

The US should push for him to replace Annan when his term expires.


7 posted on 03/15/2005 9:36:59 AM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Is that Mr. Annan hiding in the Men's Room: perched atop a United Nations toilet in a stall, I see holding my laptop? He seems to be hiding.


8 posted on 03/15/2005 9:48:14 AM PST by greatsquire (Is that Mr. Annan..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
"Bolton’s critics suggest that his recognition of the weaknesses of the world body and his persistent calls for reform over the years disqualify him for the job"

I have no doubt that his critics have suggested this, but I want to know how little sense a person can make and still be alive. That statement, not to mention that way of thinking, is absurd.

9 posted on 03/15/2005 10:26:17 AM PST by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma

If you are looking for logic or reason from the liberals, you will wait till Hell freezes over before that ever happens.


10 posted on 03/15/2005 11:58:58 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Bolton said he doesn't do carrots.


11 posted on 03/15/2005 12:00:45 PM PST by Semper Paratus (:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
The president and Secretary Rice say that Bolton will go to New York to lead an effort to reform the place before it is too late. Bolton is one of the very few people who might be able to handle or even understand the assignment.

I doubt that anybody at the UN believes that the President or Bolton are interested in saving the UN, so why should they accept their reforms?

12 posted on 03/15/2005 12:05:21 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
They can accept the reforms, or they can take the UN to another country and we will withdraw our financial support. These are their choices, and there is very little wiggle room. Personally I think it's the biggest bunch of crooks and thieves ever assembled in one place. I wish they would force our hand, but they aren't that stupid. They know the gravy train goes away if we pull out. They will reform, and then they will figure out new ways to steal the money of other nations just like they did in the case of Iraq.
13 posted on 03/15/2005 12:58:59 PM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson