[goldstategop]

No. It was an amendment to California's Family Code. A state law at variance with the State Constitution CAN be declared unconstitutional. Though I'm at a loss to see how confining marriage between a man and a woman violates any one's rights.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[Kretek]

It was an amendment to California's Family Code. A state law at variance with the State Constitution CAN be declared unconstitutional.

Yes, even those state laws enacted by a general vote of the people at referendum. Only constitutional amendments are immune from challenge as unconstitutional; amendments are constitutional by definition.

Although one poster did point out to me a case from Colorado which I haven't had time to review yet.