Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
I agree with you completely. I do not like judicial activism either, and my argument wasn't offered as a legal justification of homosexual union either, but rather as a practical one. I understand that you and I are on opposite sides of this issue and I realize that I won't change you mind. And as for a Constitutional Amendment, I also agree, that is the way to go, keep the judges out of it as much as possible (of course I think that our versions of that amendment would differ slightly, LOL)
297 posted on 03/14/2005 5:51:22 PM PST by SilentServiceCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: SilentServiceCPO
...of course I think that our versions of that amendment would differ slightly, LOL

Of that, I have no doubt. :-}

299 posted on 03/14/2005 5:56:19 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]

To: SilentServiceCPO

The Torie plan is to pass an amendment giving Congress the power to pass a national law on this one way or the other, or regarding Civil Unions. Odd that only I seem to support such a proposal, when the idea seems to be so demonstrably fair and sensible. :)


322 posted on 03/14/2005 6:27:33 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson