[SilentServiceCPO]

So let's presume this; in order to get the same civil benefits, homosexuals marry for convenience. Now who who you like living next to you, a quiet, loving couple, going to work each day, cooking out in the back yard, mowing the lawn, you know, normal people stuff OR a nominally married gay couple, hitting the bars at night looking for love/sex, different men/women over every night, and loud raucous parties? I would prefer the former.

[jwalsh07]

I don't accept your premise at all.

Look, I don't want the state preaching that heterosexual and homosexual unions are the same. It's as simple as that.

My friend Torie will tell you that I'm set in concrete on this. No sense trying to convince me. My ways are not in error.

[D-Generation X]

Now who who you like living next to you, a quiet, loving couple, going to work each day, cooking out in the back yard, mowing the lawn, you know, normal people stuff OR a nominally married gay couple, hitting the bars at night looking for love/sex, different men/women over every night, and loud raucous parties? I would prefer the former.

That bubolic image of two gays living like a man and woman is Hollywood BS!

Sorry but gays will always live sick lifestyles because they are sick themselves.

[Raycpa]

Now who who you like living next to you, a quiet, loving couple, going to work each day, cooking out in the back yard, mowing the lawn, you know, normal people stuff OR a nominally married gay couple, hitting the bars at night looking for love/sex, different men/women over every night, and loud raucous parties?

Are you implying that gays cannot behave themselves without marriage ?