Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rambler7
Well, it does seem unconstitutional. I mean, isn't that why some think there would have to be a constitutional amendment against it for it to remain illegal?

The amendment is to make it clear to activist judges who tend to interpret the law according to their present mood that it is indeed unconstitutional.

114 posted on 03/14/2005 1:32:18 PM PST by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: nosofar

QUOTE:
Well, it does seem unconstitutional. I mean, isn't that why some think there would have to be a constitutional amendment against it for it to remain illegal?

The amendment is to make it clear to activist judges who tend to interpret the law according to their present mood that it is indeed unconstitutional.
ENDQUOTE

OK, I'LL BITE. EXPLAIN TO ME (AND TO A WHOLE LOTTA JUDGES IN A WHOLE LOTTA PLACES, SEEMS) HOW IT IS PRESENTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.


223 posted on 03/14/2005 4:03:09 PM PST by Rambler7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson