Really...I guess that if Nichols had been out on bond-obviously the "threat" wasn't there. Had it been though, he would have been treated the same way? I had forgotten the fact that he had been out on bond? What sense would it make to shackle him in the court when he had just been out in public? As far as court goes, in trials of "accused" potentially violent offenders, what is the protection to the court?
Had not heard that he was out on bond. Heard that he was in prison for the past six months.