Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P_A_I

I would have to read this more carefully, but it looks pretty good on a quick peruse. My favorite line in it is one of my main soapboxes:

"It may not be applied in the way it was intended by those who wrote and adopted the original act"

Although I think it should, more clearly, read:

"In may not be applied in a way other than it was intended by those who wrote and adopted the original act."


10 posted on 03/13/2005 10:51:57 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sola Veritas
Any statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling which is inconsistent with that supreme law and not derived from it is unconstitutional and null and void from inception.
There are several ways in which statutes or other official acts may be unconstitutional:

"--- It may not be applied in the way it was intended by those who wrote and adopted the original act. -- "

Sola Veritas wrote:
I think it should, more clearly, read:<

"In may not be applied in a way other than it was intended by those who wrote and adopted the original act."

Good catch. It does make better sense with that additional word.. -- Thanks.

16 posted on 03/13/2005 11:23:48 AM PST by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson