I wouldn't dare to tell you such a thing. In fact, I don't see it that way at all (and, in my opinion you are over-reacting JUST a bit in making such a comparison).
I'll rephrase - the Pro-Life movement has made tremendous gains both olitically and socially in the last thirty years. Choosing to go over the cliff for Hillary in `08 if you do not get a 100% pro-life candidate will allow a Hillary presidency to undo EVERYTHING we have gained in the last thirty years.
It's not Hitler OR Stalin. It's pragmatism (a GOP President will still be nominating conservative judges more amenable to the pro-life movement) OR bullheaded suicide.
Staying home in `08 and allowing Hillary her 5% solution and the White House will kill far more unborn children going into the future than rolling up your sleeves and assisting in an all-out effort to keep the Executive Branch in the hands of Republicans. THAT'S A FACT - those of you going over the cliff for your principles just don't want to acknowledge that.
I wouldn't dare to tell you such a thing. In fact, I don't see it that way at all (and, in my opinion you are over-reacting JUST a bit in making such a comparison).
I'll rephrase - the Pro-Life movement has made tremendous gains both olitically and socially in the last thirty years. Choosing to go over the cliff for Hillary in `08 if you do not get a 100% pro-life candidate will allow a Hillary presidency to undo EVERYTHING we have gained in the last thirty years.
It's not Hitler OR Stalin. It's pragmatism (a GOP President will still be nominating conservative judges more amenable to the pro-life movement) OR bullheaded suicide.
Staying home in `08 and allowing Hillary her 5% solution and the White House will kill far more unborn children going into the future than rolling up your sleeves and assisting in an all-out effort to keep the Executive Branch in the hands of Republicans. THAT'S A FACT - those of you going over the cliff for your principles just don't want to acknowledge that.