Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog

i agree- this is disappointing language coming from her. she needs to be more careful with such an important issue. you can't be half-pregnant, as they say. if you read on she says bush is "exactly" right on the issue, which suggests she's really pro-life... i wonder if this is a calculated strategy to appeal to women voters...if so, it's clumsy.


7 posted on 03/13/2005 6:17:24 AM PST by kevin fortuna (people with a cause: sometimes you have to wonder how empty their lives must otherwise be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: kevin fortuna
i agree- this is disappointing language coming from her.

This is nothing new from her. She stated right from the start that she is "reluctantly" pro choice. I don't know what she means by reluctantly but I would hazard a guess that she supports it under some conditions.

I would still vote for her because the evil of putting another demo into office, especially Hillary, is too much to contemplate. Besides, if you are stuck on only one issue then our party is in trouble.

We can splinter into hundreds of groups that are each stuck on their one issue! This is ridiculus.

67 posted on 03/13/2005 8:33:24 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson