She says one fairly good thing and one very bad thing in this article.
The fairly good: "I am a strong proponent of parental choice -- of parental notification. I am a strong proponent of a ban on late-term abortion." She also favors a culture of life, and promoting adoption over abortion, so that abortion is truly rare.
The very bad: "This should be an issue pretty infrequently because we ought to have a culture that says that, 'Who wants to have an abortion? Who wants to see a daughter or a friend or a sibling go through something like that?'"
That her thinking goes first to the woman who puts a contract on her child, and not the child who is poisoned, dismembered, otherwise brutally murdered, points to a fundamental cluelessness about this major issue. It's like saying, "Child abuse should be an issue pretty infrequently because we ought to have a culture that says that, 'Who wants to abuse a three-year-old? Who wants to see a daughter or a friend or a sibling go through something like that?'"
Dan
Excellent analogy.
I believe you are misunderstanding her.
I believe she makes a case for promoting a culture of reverence for the unborn to the point that most citizens would find aborting a pregnancy to kill a fetus to be too abhorrent to contemplate.