Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: American Sovereignty Defender

1) This was too big to be a nuke unless it was the largest of thermonuclear weapons (of a size even the US no longer has in its arsenal).

2) It was 35 miles deep. Can't be a nuke.

3) Nuclear explosions and quakes, even of the same magnitude, are INSTANTLY and easily distinguished on all seismographs. NEIC wouldn't have listed it as an earthquake otherwise.


61 posted on 03/12/2005 11:16:01 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

"Nuclear explosions and quakes, even of the same magnitude, are INSTANTLY and easily distinguished on all seismographs."

Definitely NOT true.

The evaluation process cannot be done "instantly", is definitely not "easy", and definitely cannot be done on "all seismographs". In many cases, it is easy to classify as "definite earthquake", but classifying as "nuclear explosion" is much more difficult.


75 posted on 03/13/2005 6:08:44 AM PST by JSloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson