[Trinity_Tx]

" the unborn child is never any threat to the mother, and if any problem exists the child usually mis-caries spontaneously due to the lack of oxygen."

That just isn't true, edit. There are conditions that make carrying a pregnancy to term extremely risky for a mother. I watched one friend die leaving 3 very young children and her baby without a mother, because she refused to abort and get treatment for her cancer.

Now, one of my best friends is enduring something similar as we speak.

By trying to keep this baby, it is more than likely she will die and leave her - likely unhealthy - baby and two other kids without a mother.

In her case, I believe she should have had an abortion in the earliest weeks. Some of y'all radicals will try to say that means I'm pro-abortion or evil but it is just wrong. And if you're that type, don;t bother - I couldn't care less what you think anyway. So there. lol :P

[sandbar]

Trinity, please read post 885 by me. I know someone in a similiar dilemna as we speak.

[editor-surveyor]

" because she refused to abort and get treatment for her cancer."

Whether you realize it or not, you have erected a strawman with that statement. Proper, natural cancer treatment will not result in an abortion, or any harm to the child. Anona Muricata, which is the most potent cytotoxin known, is not harmful to the unborn child. It is a tragedy that the $$ hungry oncologists push treatments that kill the patient almost as fast as they kill the tumor, simply because they make more money that way. Abortion is never necessary.