Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
Yes, it means that she condones murder of the most helpless.

No. It means she's carefully weighs the Life of the Child against the Liberty of the Mother. I beleive abortion should be allowed in the case of Rape, Incest, or risk of death to the Mother. Most of America does too - Republicans, Democrats, Independents.

259 posted on 03/11/2005 7:23:44 PM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: Fenris6
"No. It means she's carefully weighs the Life of the Child against the Liberty of the Mother."

SAve that crap for the outhouse, I wasn't born yesterday. Before Roe v Wade there never was any question, a doctor always saved the most viable life if there was any question, but in reality the question didn't arise; the unborn child is never any threat to the mother, and if any problem exists the child usually mis-caries spontaneously due to the lack of oxygen.

There is no liberty to take a life, it's murder.

356 posted on 03/11/2005 7:37:56 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

To: Fenris6
I beleive abortion should be allowed in the case of Rape, Incest, or risk of death to the Mother.

Ah, but there is the rub. That third 'case' you cite is where the nebulous part of 'ethical' comes in. Sort of like the meaning of 'is'.

570 posted on 03/11/2005 8:12:49 PM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson