2 things:
1. Before you even posted to me, I made it clear I was not generalizing, but only talking about the ones who were holding back progress. You can deny that they alienate support, just as you deny, or justify, your own uncalled-for manner. We disagree.
2. But, I'll happily take everything back, and say I think there is no problem, and that the mandate for change is as strong as it can be, if you'll just give it a rest.
Dear Trinity_Tx,
1. But you did generalize, and falsely, reporting a pseudo-history that doesn't actually exist in this reality. Maybe an alternative reality, but not this one. You stated that, as an example, the failure to achieve an enforceable ban on partial birth abortion was because:
"It is your 'strategy' of dogmatism and rudely offending everyone who you even think veers even slightly away from your position that hasn't even been able to get rid of partial birth abortion."
That is axiomatically false. The effort to ban partial birth abortion is, in itself, a massive compromise.
Yet, laws HAVE been passed at state and federal level banning partial birth abortion. It is the pro-abortion elite, exercising their raw power through the anti-democratic fascist means of five dirtbags wearing black, doing the bidding of their death-worshipping Master, who prevent the laws from taking effect.
Your attempt to blame the pro-life movement, or even some part thereof for the abuse of power of the pro-abortion elites is offensive, and an insult to all the good and decent people who have worked their butts off to make even the smallest of changes in the law, to win even the smallest victories, the smallest compromises.
2. Okay. Although that is your assertion, not mine.
sitetest