Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: darkmatter
Seems to me the real issue is judges. Condi is against federal funding and partial birth, and for parental notification. That covers everything that could possibly be done against abortion by the President or Congress. The only other issue is whether she would appoint strict constructionist judges, or slant judicial appointments to protect Roe. It ought at least to be possible to be pro-choice and still not be crazy about Roe's jurisprudence. If her judicial picks would undermine the Left's control over the judiciary, then she would be giving pro-lifers everything they need from a president. The question is whether being pro-choice is a religion for her, as it is for most Democrats, or really just a "mild" opinion that would be satisfied to see the issue hashed out state by state.
1,410 posted on 03/12/2005 3:41:28 PM PST by Southern Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Southern Federalist

Amen Couldn't have said it better.


1,411 posted on 03/12/2005 3:51:41 PM PST by darkmatter (Let them hate. As long as they fear. -Julius Caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1410 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson