To: SilentServiceCPOWife
"How many unborn children will be saved by staying home and allowing Hillary Clinton to be elected?"
How many would be by saved voting for Rice? If they are both pro-abortion then it's not going to make a difference. A pro-abortion Republican deserves to lose. That way maybe the party won't be stupid enough to nominate another.
To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
How many would be by saved voting for Rice? If they are both pro-abortion then it's not going to make a differenceHere's a clue: neither one will make a difference, no matter what their position is. But go ahead and sit on your hands out of spite. I'll be here for the next 8 years of Clinton to mock evangelical idiots everytime they whine about President Hillary.
159 posted on
03/11/2005 7:07:30 PM PST by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
And how many born children will die at the hands of terrorists if she is?The previous was the other part of my post. If Condoleeza Rice's views on abortion are the same as Hillary Clinton's (and we don't know for sure at this point that they are), wouldn't it be better to have a President that we know will at least make sure that the children that have already been born are safe?
186 posted on
03/11/2005 7:12:04 PM PST by
SilentServiceCPOWife
("It's a good life...if you don't weaken." - - my grandmother)
To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
"mildly pro choice" indicates "against partial-birth abortion". With Rice in over Clinton, at the very least you have a chance to outlaw that practice.
233 posted on
03/11/2005 7:19:17 PM PST by
pa mom
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson