Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomCalls
Ugh, that isn't "midly pro-choice". I would consider that pro-life with a few extremely rare exceptions. She considered herself to be "libertarian" on this issue which if you think about it doesn't mean anti government intervention considering no matter what side of the issue you're on there will be government intervention from the feds or the state. And where have you heard that she is against Roe vs Wade?
126 posted on 03/11/2005 7:02:22 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: bahblahbah
Ugh, that isn't "midly pro-choice".

I certainly think it is. Maybe she does too.

I would consider that pro-life with a few extremely rare exceptions.

You haven't been reading the posts here have you? The absolutists think ANY allowances for abortion makes you the devil incarnate. They don't allow for any "exception" in the pro-life side of the aisle.

And where have you heard that she is against Roe vs Wade?

Where have you heard she is for it?

227 posted on 03/11/2005 7:18:41 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson