The party majority is pro life.
We still have not quite fully defined that, "pro life." I would assert that if my views and yours were laid out before GOP voters, that the division would be rather even. Of course, in my state of California, I would "win" going away. :) What we need to do for the moment, is ban third trimester abotions, absent a demonstrable physical threat to the material health of the mother, and make that a crime. We need to involve parents in the decision, absent a court order otherwise, that involving them would result in material physical or mental abuse of the minor. We need to overturn Roe v Wade and beyond that, its toxic and based on my a priori beliefs, its more toxic progeny. That is what the GOP needs to do now. On that, the party can be largely united.
Perhaps, but they are not single issue advocates. For those of you in Rio Linda, that means they will consider a candidate that does not have a either or view, or place a different priority on the matter. A view that is attacked by people with blinders on.
As evidence, I present this thread and many others.
ONE of the beliefs of the GOP is pro-life; one of them. And it's not even the first one.