The reason I thought monarchists would be interested is the issue of the normative to any social theory of free individual character of feudalism, that the conversation between Jackbob and me morphed into. I am curious to see to what extent the anarchist flavor of feudalism appeals to monarchists. I know it appeals to anarchists and hence to at least some libertarians.
Thanks for your excellent and very interesting comments on this thread, which as you say indeed moved it towards my favorite topic. I certainly agree that there is much to be said for feudalism. While I am not exactly a libertarian, even of the paleo variety, compared to 21st-century democratic statists any traditional monarchist is relatively libertarian.
I once asked one of my Catholic monarchist correspondents who has Distributist leanings what he thought of paleolibertarianism/anarcho-capitalism; he replied that he certainly wished that these two camps constituted mainstream political discourse instead of Democrats and Republicans.