Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jackbob

Very good. I agree. Do you consider this view of kindness to be a Randian position, a logical expansion of the Randian position done by you, or would you say that it contradicts the Randian position?

You realize that I need to reconcile your statement with Rand's celebration of greed and view on altruism as another form of greed.


250 posted on 04/01/2005 11:40:05 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
I would say a little of all three. Some from Rand, some from my expansion of Rand, and definitely a lot in contradiction of Rand. But also it is from conclusions I've drawn from other writings on ethics unrelated to Rand or libertarianism. I have never studied ethics, and any insight I might have is limited to writings I accidentally fell upon, and impressed me.

You realize that I need to reconcile your statement with Rand's celebration of greed and view on altruism as another form of greed.

I plead ignorance here. Your meaning escapes me, and am thereby unable to answer.

252 posted on 04/01/2005 12:19:01 PM PST by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

To: annalex

Please accept my apology. The meaning of what you ask is quite clear. My excuse is that I am responding while also doing paper work that has to be done before I go off to work. I will answer tonight after working a few hours. Business must come first.


254 posted on 04/01/2005 12:40:50 PM PST by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

To: annalex
You realize that I need to reconcile your statement with Rand's celebration of greed and view on altruism as another form of greed.

First off let me say I have never had a need to reconcile my opinions with Rand's opinions. She has never had a major influence on my points of view. As far as greed goes, my position, unlike Rand and her followers, is not of the view that greed should be seen as a positive. For me, greed is a neutral term, usually used negatively because of an often wrongfully implied excessiveness. Which by the way, is the reason I also usually choose to use the word greed as a negative.

Now for altruism. I have never said altruism is an another form of greed. What I have said is that it is phony and does not actually exist. I say it is self deceptive point of view, which feeds various selfish needs, and thereby is an unconscious form of selfishness. Unlike self centeredness (which I always view as a negative), selfishness to me is a neutral fact, viewable correctly as both negative and positive. I choose to use it as a positive most of the time, as it can make easy explaining more hard to explain concepts regarding various forms of profits earned from human action.

But now after writing this I must admit that since I do view altruism (practice by individuals, as opposed to advocated) as excessive, and thereby quite possibly instigated by an excessive want of certain forms of non-material profits, it may very well be a form of greed. But I have not thought this one through enough to assert it to be so.

258 posted on 04/01/2005 10:53:24 PM PST by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson