1 posted on
03/11/2005 8:17:22 AM PST by
wingblade
To: wingblade
Just use a dang shuttle and get it done.
To: wingblade
I would not fly the shuttle a couple reasons when the solid boosters got framacated into segments from one piece,and second management there is less than desirable (Re Challenger) third parts for it come from Affirmative Action Infested manufacturing.
9 posted on
03/11/2005 8:39:05 AM PST by
Fast1
(Destroy America buy Chinese goods.)
To: wingblade
They need to suck it up and use the shuttle. Hubble needs to be saved!
Mike
12 posted on
03/11/2005 8:44:58 AM PST by
MichaelP
To: wingblade
Just take all the spare parts, add a new lens and enclosure, and mount a new scope on the ISS.
Problem solved.
15 posted on
03/11/2005 8:49:46 AM PST by
Cold Heat
(This space is being paid not to do anything.)
To: wingblade
EEEEEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWW!!!.....
17 posted on
03/11/2005 9:00:11 AM PST by
Hatteras
To: wingblade
if they closed down the Texas super colider over 200 million they can stop the Hubble. this is a joke that shows any government program designed for two years can lvie 40.
18 posted on
03/11/2005 9:08:04 AM PST by
q_an_a
To: wingblade
The Hubble is a sentimental favorite for everybody, and it is hard to accept that its mission might just simply be over, a couple years before the next generation space scope is deployed. This thing has served a big time fodder for Bush-bashing conspiracy theories. Robot fix-it missions have been deeemed impractical, the Shutttles aren't flying either, engineers think they can extend functionality by goign down to two gyros, the next generation scope is coming... why is this such an endless discussion?
To: wingblade; RadioAstronomer
Why not ask the Russians to service Hubble?OFFER THEM HALF OWNERSHIP IN IT
They just might accept. Prestige (in helping poooor America), appeal to their slavic sense of machismo, and finally jump start their astronomy program, which they tend to neglect.
Alternative is to watch the last gyro fail, start tumbling, and years later, re-enter.
We must preserve the Hubble!
24 posted on
03/11/2005 9:57:05 AM PST by
sauron
("Truth is hate to those who hate Truth" --unknown)
To: wingblade
Should Congress micromanage the space program? Congress could take a real lead and create private property rights in outer space and suggest the President should invoke the withdrawal clause in the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty.
35 posted on
03/11/2005 10:18:01 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
To: wingblade
Translation: NASA-Greenbelt stands to benefit. Sen. Mikulski wouldn't give a d@mn if there weren't $$$'s in it for Maryland.
43 posted on
03/11/2005 10:56:42 AM PST by
Tallguy
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...
48 posted on
03/11/2005 12:12:37 PM PST by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson