Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F16Fighter

'Once the butchering began on the beach, it was time to withdraw and re-group.'

Great idea! The casualties would have been way lower on the front end of a rout.

'As the Marines waded in through Iwo, they were hit from all different directions.'

From the sea as well? The assault waves made it ashore, once there the Japanese opened up. By nightfall 30000 Marines were ashore and Mt Suribachi was isolated. 2400 casualties 600 dead on the first day but no longer on the beach. Five days later, the 3rd MarDiv came ashore bringing the total to 82000 men. When do you pull the plug? First day when you have to evac 30000 men? Or after the 5th when you would have 80000+ thousand? This is the worst type of monday morning QBing. You have no answer just an insistence it was a bad decision.

Gen Smith predicted 15000 casualties when the bombardment couldn't be extended.


227 posted on 03/10/2005 7:28:32 PM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: xone
Hey -- argue all day that the only option was being left high and dry to the tune of 6,800 KIA and 20,000 casualties for the sake of an airstrip.

The Joint Staff got bad intel and painted themselves in a corner. Or rather an expendable force in a corner.

So what of a contingency plan? That's right, there was none. Hell, I don't know what kind of resources were available to help relieve the pressure of the first wave of Marines taking the pounding.

"Gen Smith predicted 15000 casualties when the bombardment couldn't be extended."

And WHY couldn't the bombardment be extended?

235 posted on 03/10/2005 8:04:09 PM PST by F16Fighter (Wardaddy ain't heavy -- he's my brother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson