Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F16Fighter
Once the butchering began on the beach, it was time to withdraw and re-group.

I am no military expert or tactician, but suppose they had withdrawn as the casualties began to mount. . . .

Wouldn't there have been more casualties as we retreated and yet more when we renewed the attack on now more heavily fortified Japanese positions? Would it have been a trade off in losses without gaining any territory?

Just asking.

194 posted on 03/10/2005 5:02:40 PM PST by Badray (Quinn's First Law -- Liberalism ALWAYS generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: Badray
"Wouldn't there have been more casualties as we retreated and yet more when we renewed the attack on now more heavily fortified Japanese positions? Would it have been a trade off in losses without gaining any territory?"

Fair question Ray.

As the Marines waded in through Iwo, they were hit from all different directions. NO trees, NO foliage, NO screens. Buck naked.

It may just be that this was an miscalculated plan in the first place...with NO option "B".

201 posted on 03/10/2005 5:37:52 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson