[VadeRetro]

Let's try yet another way of looking at this. Let's multiply 1.63 x 10^-14 by four billion years and call it acceleration years. It's like asking whether if you speeded up time by a factor of four billion, would the acceleration be more visible?

I'm ignoring whether the acceleration by gravity would work faster as well, which it would. I'm also temporarily waiving every other objection I've made on the subject.

The new ratio is .0000652 if I'm using my calculator correctly. It still don't move much.

[VadeRetro]

I'm ignoring whether the acceleration by gravity would work faster as well, which it would...

But that's already in the ratio so it's not being ignored.

[Fish Hunter]

Actually you need to multiply it by a billion years * 365 days*24 hours*60mins*60 seconds. Then square that number (a*t^2). You will get a big number that does amount to much because the noise is always positive and it has a radial direction outward. The other noise you were talking about is in random directions and therefore cancels out.

NonLinear convinced me I was wrong using another approach. You two guys showed a lot of class, not like some of the other despicable smart asses on this thread. I still want to pursue this under a different avenue because this is really fascinating stuff. (I need to look at case where the solar pressure changes over the eons due to the age of the sun, I want to figure out if this would cause any unstability in the Earth's orbit over a celestial time-frame)

Cudos,

FH